Daily Ards Research Analysis

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) remains a significant clinical challenge, with high morbidity and mortality rates despite advances in supportive care. Mechanical ventilation is central to the management of this condition, yet sex-related differences have been largely overlooked in research and clinical practice. Female patients have smaller lung volumes, different chest wall mechanics, and hormonal modifications that affect inflammation, vascular tone, respiratory compliance, and respiratory drive. These have an impact on treatment and care. This narrative review synthesises current evidence on sex-specific physiological differences affecting ARDS management. It evaluates the impact of physiological differences on lung volumes, chest wall mechanics, and pharmacokinetics and emphasises the importance of personalised ventilation and sedation strategies. Female patients exhibit greater susceptibility to ventilator-induced lung injury. Recent physiological studies show that, despite lower absolute mechanical power, each 1 J min

Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is one of the leading causes of death worldwide. Although corticosteroids have been proposed as immunomodulatory, controversies surrounding the results of clinical trials have limited their widespread use. This review aims to determine which biomarker-guided corticosteroid treatment for CAP is generally agreed upon in the latest published studies and to discuss the main aspects to be taken into consideration based on lessons learnt from patients with conditions such as influenza, SARS-CoV-2 infection or the recently identified subphenotypes in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Most studies have demonstrated that high C-reactive protein concentrations at the time of admission are associated with a hyperinflammatory state and that patients are more likely to benefit from corticosteroid treatment if they have high concentrations. High levels of C-reactive protein (CRP) were used as an inclusion criterion in one clinical trial, demonstrating that treatment failure was reduced in the corticosteroid group. A post-hoc analysis of the results of several studies also showed that CRP levels above 200 mg/L were associated with benefits in patients receiving corticosteroids. Recent guidelines have proposed the use of corticosteroids in patients with severe CAP or septic shock. Corticosteroids could be more beneficial for patients with a hyperinflammatory subphenotype; however, there are currently no prospective studies evaluating this approach. Further studies are needed to clarify the role of biomarkers in personalised medicine for patients with CAP. In the meantime, patients with severe CAP or high CRP levels should be treated with corticosteroids.

Excessive right heart load imposes an acute or chronic injury on the right ventricle (RV), predisposing critically ill neonates and cardiac surgical patients to RV failure, low cardiac output syndrome, and death. Inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) is a selective pulmonary vasodilator that improves ventilation-perfusion matching and unloads the RV without systemic hypotension; nonetheless, its application beyond established neonatal indications remains contentious. Our review synthesizes current mechanistic, translational, and clinical evidence regarding iNO use in three major settings characterized by excessive RV load: (1) neonatal pulmonary hypertension, particularly PPHN; (2) acute and chronic RV overload in older children and adults, including secondary pulmonary hypertension, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and acute pulmonary embolism; and (3) perioperative and post-cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) management in congenital and adult cardiac surgery. In term and near-term infants with hypoxic respiratory failure, pivotal randomized trials show that iNO consistently improves oxygenation and reduces extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) use, but this has little effect on survival and long-term neurodevelopment. In ARDS and other adult critical-care indications, iNO provides transient improvements in gas exchange and RV performance without reducing mortality or ventilator duration, and meta-analyses signal an increased risk of acute kidney injury, particularly with prolonged use. In contrast, perioperative studies around CPB demonstrate that prophylactic postoperative iNO and intra-CPB nitric oxide administration can attenuate pulmonary hypertensive crises, facilitate separation from CPB, shorten ventilation and intensive care stay, and, in selected high-risk cohorts, may reduce cardiac surgery-associated acute kidney injury, although survival benefits remain unproven. Across these scenarios, iNO should be used judiciously and in a pathophysiology-driven manner as a time-limited, targeted adjunct to stabilize patients with documented or anticipated RV strain rather than a disease-modifying therapy. Future work should refine patient selection, timing, dosing, and weaning strategies, and define the long-term safety and cost-effectiveness of iNO within contemporary multimodal RV support pathways.